I don't understand the math, but they are saying vaping is not 95 percent safer. Rather, it's thousands of times safer.
![[IMG]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uGlJG1fJKXNbkzHr4IpCZs0s2-ll4M3UbYu2XUcWq791z2tKRbRj588qFDMn1DILoedv5SXkc-=s0-d)
Sent from my R1 HD using Tapatalk
from General Vaping Discussion http://ift.tt/2An1aMu
Wednesday, 8 November 2017
General Vaping Discussion
Measurements of electronic cigarette-generated particles for the evaluation of lung cancer risk of active and passive users - ScienceDirect
I don't understand the math, but they are saying vaping is not 95 percent safer. Rather, it's thousands of times safer.
Sent from my R1 HD using Tapatalk
from General Vaping Discussion http://ift.tt/2An1aMu
I don't understand the math, but they are saying vaping is not 95 percent safer. Rather, it's thousands of times safer.
Sent from my R1 HD using Tapatalk
from General Vaping Discussion http://ift.tt/2An1aMu
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment